MDG Home |
|
|
|
What's Inside |
|
Summary Tables |
|
MDG Indicators |
|
|
|
FAQs |
|
|
|
Region I MDGs |
|
|
Goal 8.
Develop a global partnership for development
|
|
|
Regional Situationer |
|
|
|
(as of December 2005) |
|
|
Proportion of
NGOs/basic sectors represented to Local Special Bodies |
|
|
Region I MDG Indicators |
|
|
a. Local
Development Council |
|
|
Data Assessment |
|
|
Province/City |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
|
Summary
Tables |
|
| Region I |
|
|
|
48.86 |
46.60 |
46.32 |
46.24 |
43.57 |
|
|
MDG Watch |
|
| Ilocos Sur |
|
|
|
57.34 |
57.34 |
57.34 |
57.34 |
53.12 |
|
|
Regional |
|
| La Union |
44.93 |
43.54 |
42.23 |
37.90 |
37.71 |
37.00 |
37.16 |
35.87 |
|
|
Provincial/City |
|
| Candon City |
|
|
|
31.75 |
31.75 |
31.75 |
31.75 |
19.05 |
|
| |
|
| Sn. Fernando City |
52.08 |
45.83 |
40.74 |
42.31 |
40.74 |
42.31 |
42.31 |
42.31 |
|
Vigan City |
|
|
|
57.14 |
57.14 |
57.14 |
57.14 |
62.50 |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
b. Local Health Board |
|
Province/City |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
Region 1 |
|
|
|
7.69 |
7.60 |
7.55 |
7.43 |
7.28 |
|
Ilocos Sur |
|
|
|
9.56 |
9.56 |
9.56 |
9.56 |
9.46 |
|
La Union |
7.83 |
7.58 |
7.36 |
6.85 |
6.68 |
6.56 |
6.31 |
5.83 |
|
Candon City |
|
|
|
1.59 |
1.59 |
1.59 |
1.59 |
1.59 |
|
San Fernando City |
10.42 |
10.42 |
9.26 |
9.62 |
9.26 |
9.62 |
9.62 |
9.62 |
|
Vigan City |
|
|
|
2.86 |
2.86 |
2.86 |
2.86 |
3.13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Province/City |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|
Region 1 |
|
|
|
10.63 |
10.50 |
10.44 |
10.46 |
10.59 |
|
Ilocos Sur |
|
|
|
11.42 |
11.42 |
11.42 |
11.42 |
11.61 |
|
La Union |
13.91 |
13.48 |
12.81 |
11.98 |
11.69 |
11.48 |
11.49 |
10.99 |
|
Candon City |
|
|
|
1.59 |
1.59 |
1.59 |
1.59 |
4.76 |
|
San Fernando City |
6.25 |
6.25 |
5.56 |
5.77 |
5.56 |
5.77 |
5.77 |
5.77 |
|
Vigan City |
|
|
|
8.57 |
8.57 |
8.57 |
8.57 |
9.38 |
|
|
| |
|
| Source of Data:
Department of Interior and Local Government |
| Formula:
Proportion is the Total LDC/LHB/LSB ÷ Total NGOs Accredited x 100 |
Remarks (Data
Limitations):
1.Regional proportion computed for 2001-2005 using data from Ilocos
Sur, La Union, Vigan City, Candon City and San Fernando City.
2. Preliminary data from DILG RO I
3. The raw data provided by LGUs was on the number of accredited NGOs
and number of LDCs, LHBs and LSBs. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Proportion of
barangays with "Botika sa Barangay" |
|
| |
|
|
Province/City |
2004 |
2005 |
|
Region 1 |
13.57 a/ |
7.90 |
|
Ilocos Norte |
11.49 |
19.57 |
|
Ilocos Sur |
19.27 |
31.82 |
|
La Union |
7.99 |
17.01 |
|
Pangasinan |
|
4.69 |
|
|
| |
|
| Source of Data:
Department of Health |
| Formula: (No.
of botika sa barangay/no. of barangays) x 100 |
Remarks (Data
Limitations):
a/ Data does not include Pangasinan since the province didn't have any
Botica sa Barangay. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Telephone density
(per 100 population) |
|
| |
|
|
Province/City |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 a/ |
|
Region 1 |
3.88 |
5.80 |
5.49 |
4.32 |
4.25 |
4.12 |
4.08 |
4.25 |
|
Ilocos Norte |
2.05 |
1.94 |
1.84 |
2.37 |
1.95 |
1.90 |
1.94 |
3.98 |
|
Ilocos Sur |
2.47 |
5.62 |
6.77 |
3.17 |
0.64 |
0.62 |
0.59 |
3.71 |
|
La Union |
1.08 |
2.35 |
2.29 |
2.04 |
2.10 |
2.03 |
2.13 |
3.98 |
|
Pangasinan |
3.06 |
4.31 |
3.87 |
3.91 |
3.33 |
3.22 |
3.30 |
4.33 |
|
Alaminos City |
|
|
|
|
4.61 |
4.44 |
6.24 |
|
|
Candon City |
|
|
|
|
5.35 |
5.21 |
5.22 |
|
|
Dagupan City |
23.04 |
38.85 |
36.25 |
17.66 |
22.94 |
22.34 |
18.63 |
|
|
Laoag City |
11.51 |
16.47 |
14.73 |
5.49 |
14.18 |
13.76 |
13.25 |
|
|
San Carlos City |
4.78 |
6.17 |
6.57 |
5.20 |
5.03 |
4.87 |
5.37 |
|
|
San Fernando City |
12.20 |
18.49 |
18.25 |
23.27 |
15.08 |
14.49 |
14.18 |
|
|
Urdaneta City |
7.78 |
5.97 |
7.23 |
5.43 |
6.18 |
5.94 |
6.12 |
|
|
Vigan City |
|
|
|
|
19.91 |
19.54 |
19.20 |
|
|
|
| |
|
| Source of Data:
National Telecommunications Commission |
| Definition of
Term: Telephone density is the proportion of telephone lines
installed/equipped and population |
| Formula:
Telephone density =( No. of telephone lines installed or
equipped/Total Population) x 100 |
Remarks (Data
Limitations):
a/. Provincial data includes city data. Recomputed the telephone
density provided by source by using the 2005 Population from the 1995
Census-based Population Projection of NSO. |
| Note: 1998-1999
and 2001-2005 population data were sourced from the 1995 Census-based
City/Municipal Population Projections while the 2000 population data
is the actual population from the 2000 Census of Population and
Housing. |
|
| |
|
|
