SiteMap •  Links • Search  
 
 
       

 

Poverty Statistics 

Explanatory Notes on the 2003 Poverty Estimates

A. Trends in poverty incidence should be analyzed vis-à-vis changes in the real income of lower income groups instead of changes in the overall real average income

Table 1
Poverty Incidence, Poverty Threshold, and REAL Per Capita Incomea
by Decile,
NCR, 2000 and 2003

 

 

 

For these notes, inquiries may be made with Ms. Redencion M. Ignacio or
Ms. Glenita V. Amoranto at telefax number (632) 896-7981 or at their
e-mail addresses rm.ignacio@nscb.gov.ph / gv.amoranto@nscb.gov.ph.

 

 

      Send this page to a friend. Print printer-friendly version.      
  Email the Webmaster E-mail the webmaster Terms of Use Home • Top of Page  
   

1997-2008, National Statistical Coordination Board
Makati City, Philippines

   
Poverty Statistics
Main Page
Explanatory Notes on the
2003 Poverty Estimates

Trends in poverty incidence should be analyzed vis-à-vis changes in the real income of lower income groups instead of changes in the overall real average income

Inappropriateness of using CPI as income deflator in analyzing poverty
Per capita income versus family income as the more relevant indicator for analyzing poverty
Analysis of trends in poverty incidence versus average per capita income (at constant prices using implicit price index as deflator) by region
Growth rate of average per capita income (at current prices) versus the growth rate of the poverty threshold provides an alternative way to analyze trends in poverty incidence
GRDP not a welfare measure and should not be compared directly with poverty incidence without examining income patterns among households

Download
PDF version

[156kb]