SiteMap •  Links • Search        
 Like us in Facebook Follow us on Twitter Subscribe to our RSS feeds View mobile edition of our website. Receive updates in e-mail.
       

 

Headlines Statistically Speaking

On Professional Board Examinations: Women Versus Men!
by Dr. Romulo A. Virola 1
Secretary General, NSCB

I am one of those who passionately believe that a good education is the most important asset one can have. I therefore believe that many of the problems of our society have their roots in poor education. No way does this mean, of course, that people with “good” education are not greedy, are not corrupt, are not immoral, et cetera. I also believe that the Department of Education is the most critical department in the government bureaucracy and it saddens me that this department has not been perceived as the model government agency it should be. And it pains me even more to realize that the quality of education received by our people has deteriorated badly over the years, especially when compared to our neighbors. Maybe enough of those silly sitcoms and tearjerking telenovelas coming out of the idiot box?

Using data from the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) and the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), let us hear what some statistics on education say. And let us find out how the women are coping with the men or vice versa!

One current gender issue is the bias in the choice of professions between women and men leading to the inequitable access of women to services and opportunities. For example, very few women are enrolled in the Philippine Military Academy while much fewer men than women are in mass communication. Preliminary updated tables of the NSCB publication, Women and Men in the Philippines, Statistical Handbook show that during the school year 2001-02, the most favored field of women was business administration and related courses followed by education and teacher training. In business administration, the number of women enrollees was close to double the male enrollees, while in teaching, the women out-enrolled the men three to one. For men, the most favored field was engineering followed by business administration and related courses. In engineering, men outnumbered women three to one. This imbalance leads us to gush whenever we meet a woman piloto!

And in spite of the fact that many of us think that women are more serious with their studies and therefore have better chances of finishing, among many Filipino families facing budgetary constraints, when deciding who between a male sibling and a female sibling should have priority in going to college, chances are the son would have the edge. So, it may be surprising to many that in higher education, women outnumber men six to five (by about 300,000 for SY 2001-02). Also, many may not believe that women outnumber men in mathematics and computer science, 142, 943 to 119, 191! In law and jurisprudence, the gender gap is not as wide as some may think and is getting narrower: 8,597 women and 11,049 men, a gap of 22.2%, from 31.9% in 2000-01!

And true to expectations, in terms of completion of college education, in 2000, women outnumbered men, three to two! Mga bulakbolero, take heed!

So, what is happening to the Filipino macho? In the Filipino family where the women hold the purse, and now, everything seems to point to women holding the brains as well, where will the men go?

And what about the battle of the sexes in professional board examinations?

Each year, the PRC conducts board examinations in about 40 professions. Close to a quarter of a million graduates take these examinations with the women outnumbering the men two to one, both in terms of examinees and in terms of passers.

In 2003, the largest groups of examinees classified by minor occupational groups in accordance with the NSCB’s Philippine Standard Occupational Classification, sat for the board examinations for elementary school teachers, 75,300; secondary school teachers, 68,910; engineers and related professionals, 25,511; health professionals excluding nursing, 21,073; and nursing and midwifery professionals, 18,132.

Usually, a total of less than 90,000 examinees would pass in any given year, with an average passing rate of 35 % during the last four years. Women fared better in the exams for dentists, nurses and secondary school teachers. But surprise of all surprises! In each of the last four years, the percentage of passing for men was higher than for women, 38% versus 34%. Men generally had higher percentages of passing in the board examinations for chemists, engineers, medical doctors, nutritionists and dieticians, elementary school teachers and accountants and auditors. Does this mean men are not so hopeless, after all? My other speculative explanation will not sit well with my friends from the National Commission on the Role of Filipino Women, so I will keep that to myself! But why do men do much better than women in elementary school teachers’ examinations but do very badly compared to women in secondary school teachers’ exams?

The highest percentages of passing were recorded for ship and aircraft controllers and technicians, 62.0%; librarians, archivists and curators, 51.1%; nursing and midwifery professionals, 48.4%; social and related science professionals, 48.0% and chemists, 42.6%. Posting the lowest passing percentages were accountants and auditors, 19.5%, elementary school teachers, 24.1%; medical equipment operators, 24.9%; life science professionals, 25.4% and secondary school teachers, 28.7%. I am not so sure about the hidden meanings of these statistics, though!

I worry, however, over the decline in the percentage of passing in 2003 by about 5 percentage points from the previous years. And even more worrisome is the fact that this decline was caused by the deterioration in the passing rates for elementary and secondary school teachers by about 5.5 and 13.5 percentage points, respectively from the average of the preceding three years. It is time we asked, what will happen to our children, Miss Tapia?

Table 08 - 09 - 1
DISTRIBUTION OF EXAMINEES AND PASSERS IN PRC BOARD EXAMINATION BY SEX, 2000-2003

 

Male

Female

Total

2000

2001

2002

2003

AVE

2000

2001

2002

2003

AVE

2000

2001

2002

2003

AVE

Examinees

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number

75,994

67,334

70,386

76,840

72,639

151,007

162,872

162,984

168,374

161,309

227,001

230,206

233,370

245,214

233,948

%

33.5

29.2

30.2

31.3

31

66.5

70.8

69.8

68.7

69

100

100

100

100

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Passers

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Number

29,926

26,717

27,353

26,683

27,670

54,620

57,005

58,408

49,962

54,999

84,546

83,722

85,761

76,645

82,669

%

35.4

31.9

31.9

34.8

34

64.6

68.1

68.1

65.2

66

100

100

100

100

100

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% Passing

39.4

39.7

38.9

34.7

38

36.2

35.0

35.8

29.7

34

37.2

36.4

36.7

31.3

35

Source: Professional Regulation Commission (PRC)

Table 08-09-2
Distribution of Passers in PRC Board Examination by Sex and by Field, 2000-2003

PSOC* Code Description Male Female Total
2000 2001 2002 2003 AVE 2000 2001 2002 2003 AVE 2000 2001 2002 2003 AVE
211 Physicist, Chemists and related professionals 47.9 46.5 54.7 50.5 49.9 42.7 46.8 48.8 39.0 44.3 44.2 46.7 50.5 42.6 46.0
214 Architects and related professionals 33.0 38.0 42.3 39.9 38.3 25.9 32.9 35.5 31.0 31.3 31.3 36.6 40.6 37.3 36.4
215 Engineers and related professionals 39.7 42.8 39.4 39.9 40.4 34.5 39.0 36.9 37.4 37.0 38.7 42.1 38.9 39.3 39.8
221 Life Science professionals 41.6 55.5 40.7 26.3 41.0 31.3 48.7 30.2 24.4 33.7 37.5 52.7 36.5 25.4 38.0
222 Health professionals (except nursing) 42.4 42.7 42.2 42.3 42.4 41.0 40.4 42.0 41.9 41.3 41.4 41.0 42.1 42.0 41.6
2221 Medical Doctors 67.9 65.3 64.5 58.5 64.1 63.1 60.6 62.3 55.0 60.3 65 62.3 63.2 56.3 61.7
2222 Dentists 35.3 33.5 38.1 32.5 34.9 39.0 36.8 42.5 36.3 38.6 38.1 36.1 41.5 35.5 37.8
2225 Nutritionists and Dietitians 57.7 90.9 58.3 62.2 67.3 54.9 56.5 52.8 48.9 53.3 55.0 57.7 53.2 50.0 54.0
2228 Physical Therapy 27.9 28.1 26.0 28.0 27.5 23.5 22.4 23.5 25.5 23.7 24.9 24.2 24.3 26.3 24.9
223 Nursing and Midwifery professionals 49.1 51.7 41.0 48.7 47.6 50.3 52.4 46.4 48.3 49.4 50.1 52.3 45.5 48.4 49.1
2331 General Secondary Education Teaching professionals 22.1 21.3 23.1 15.8 20.6 52.5 45.8 47.5 33.0 44.7 45.2 39.9 41.6 28.7 38.8
2341 General Elementary Education Teaching professionals 57.4 59.2 60.5 45.5 55.6 24.3 25.3 26.5 20.6 24.2 28.3 29.5 31.0 24.1 28.2
2411 Accountants and Auditors 23.4 23.2 23.3 23.5 23.4 17.1 15.8 17.1 18.0 17.0 18.8 17.7 18.7 19.5 18.7
3133 Medical Equipment Operators 34.8 43.8 33.3 28.3 35.0 40.0 30.1 34.0 21.8 31.5 37.8 36.4 33.7 24.9 33.2
314 Ship and Aircraft Controllers and Technicians 47.2 55.6 40.7 62.1 51.4 66.7 100.0 100.0 50.0 79.2 47.2 57.9 44.8 62.0 53.0


*Philippine Standard Occupational Classification

Source: Professional Regulation Commission (PRC)

 

 

Reactions and views are welcome thru email to the author at ra.virola@nscb.gov.ph.

_______________
1 Secretary General of the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) and Chairman of the Statistical Research and Training Center (SRTC). He holds a Ph. D. in Statistics from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, USA and has taught mathematics and statistics at the University of the Philippines. He is also a past president of the Philippine Statistical Association.

Posted 09 August 2004.

 

 

Statistically Speaking
Main Page





Related Links
Press Releases

Announcements

For the Record
E-Newsletter
Media Services
Events

 

             
  Email the Webmaster E-mail the webmaster Terms of Use Home • Top of Page  
   

1997-2012, National Statistical Coordination Board
Makati City, Philippines